close× Call Us

To submit a new bibliography entry, click here


Export 233 results:
Author [ Title(Desc)] Type Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
Wantchekon L.  2003.  Clientelism and voting behavior: Evidence from a field experiment in Benin. World politics. 55:399–422.
Lyall J, Shiraito Y, Imai K.  2015.  Coethnic Bias and Wartime Informing. Journal of Politics.
Serra D.  2012.  Combining top-down and bottom-up accountability: Evidence from a bribery experiment. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 2012, vol. 28, issue 3, pages 569-587.
Dube O, Vargas JF.  2013.  Commodity price shocks and civil conflict: Evidence from Colombia. The Review of Economic Studies. 80:1384–1421.
Blair G, Imai K, Lyall J.  2014.  Comparing and Combining List and Endorsement Experiments: Evidence from Afghanistan. American Journal of Political Science. 58:1043–1063.
Arceneaux K, Gerber AS, Green DP.  2006.  Comparing experimental and matching methods using a large-scale voter mobilization experiment. Political Analysis. 14:37–62.
Arceneaux K, Nickerson DW.  2009.  Comparing negative and positive campaign messages: Evidence from two field experiments. American Politics Research.
Ocantos EGonzalez, Jonge CKiewiet, Nickerson DW.  2014.  The Conditionality of Vote-Buying Norms: Experimental Evidence from Latin America. American Journal of Political Science. 58:197–211.
Bahry DL, Wilson RK.  2006.  Confusion or fairness in the field? Rejections in the ultimatum game under the strategy method Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 60:37–54.
Eckel CC, Fatas E, Wilson R.  2010.  Cooperation and status in organizations. Journal of Public Economic Theory. 12:737–762.
Barr A, Serra D.  2010.  Corruption and culture: An experimental analysis. Journal of Public Economics. 94:862–869.
Bennion EA, Nickerson DW.  2011.  The Cost of Convenience An Experiment Showing E-Mail Outreach Decreases Voter Registration. Political Research Quarterly. 64:858–869.
Herzberg R, Wilson R.  1991.  Costly Agendas and Spatial Voting Games: Theory and Experiments on Agenda Access Costs. Laboratory Research in Political Economy. :169–99.
Dunning T, Harrison L.  2010.  Cross-cutting cleavages and ethnic voting: An experimental study of cousinage in Mali. American Political Science Review. 104:21–39.
Bossuroy T, Selway J.  2011.  Cross-cutting Cleavages, Discrimination and Inter-Personal Financial Transfers-A Lab Experiment in Chennai, India. APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper.
van der Windt P, Humphreys M.  2014.  Crowdseeding in Eastern Congo Using Cell Phones to Collect Conflict Events Data in Real Time. Journal of Conflict Resolution. :0022002714553104.
Paluck ELevy, Green DP.  2009.  Deference, dissent, and dispute resolution: An experimental intervention using mass media to change norms and behavior in Rwanda. American Political Science Review. 103:622–644.
García FMartel.  2013.  Definition and Diagnosis of Problematic Attrition in Randomized Controlled Experiments. Available at SSRN.
Blair G, Imai K, Zhou Y-Y.  2014.  Design and analysis of randomized response technique.
Stoker G, John P.  2009.  Design experiments: Engaging policy makers in the search for evidence about what works. Political Studies. 57:356–373.
Horiuchi Y, Imai K, Taniguchi N.  2007.  Designing and analyzing randomized experiments: Application to a Japanese election survey experiment. American Journal of Political Science. 51:669–687.
Sinclair B, McConnell M, Green DP.  2012.  Detecting spillover effects: Design and analysis of multilevel experiments. American Journal of Political Science. 56:1055–1069.
Trujillo MD, Paluck ELevy.  2012.  The devil knows best: Experimental effects of a televised soap opera on Latino attitudes toward government and support for the 2010 US Census. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 12:113–132.
Whitt S, Wilson RK.  2007.  The dictator game, fairness and ethnicity in postwar Bosnia. American Journal of Political Science. 51:655–668.
Farrar C, Fishkin JS, Green DP, List C, Luskin RC, Paluck ELevy.  2010.  Disaggregating deliberation’s effects: An experiment within a deliberative poll. British Journal of Political Science. 40:333–347.